about life and insurance
RSS icon Email icon
  • How to Live Your Life

    Posted on October 15th, 2009 jane No comments

    Author: Stephen Liau
    Source: ezinearticles.com

    What does learning involve us doing in life, what does learning mean?
    Learning means, we are experiencing something that we have not yet experienced!Which means learning is something that is going to be a little ‘uncomfortable’, because it is something that we do not know yet. We grow by learning things, events that we do not know yet, that is how we grow, yet we are afraid of learning of the uncertainty, how can we learn, how can we grow?When someone tells you that they want to learn. Do they really want to learn?Most people seek for comfort, not learn. What does it mean to be in ‘comfort’? It means we are living in a ‘little known’ area that we know what will happen, what can happen. Everything is predictable, nothing is unknown, it is all acceptable be it for good or for bad, it is all acceptable what ever happens because we know what could happen!Many seek comfort, to live in fear of what might happen. That’s living? Living with fear all around us?

    Can you remember the time when you were young, excited and energetic? Where you were indestructible? But, but, but I am not young anymore!
    Can you remember the time when you dare to do, to learn what you don’t know and keep learning? Where you were a sponge? But, but I am not young anymore!
    Can you remember the time when you just do without worrying about your age, your ability to adapt, the ability to heal yourself when you fall down and bleed? Your body just heal fast? But, but I am not young anymore!So what makes a person young? So that they can heal faster, learn, energetic and filled with laughter?We are certain that it is not living with in protecting one from fear! It is living the ability to live with fear, the uncertainty, the unknown! It is how to cope with living fear that makes life a joy, leaning to adapt, to live with fear, that makes life worth living instead of protected from fear just outside the comfort of your home! Some even worry about living in their home. Irony is this, we want to live, yet we are stopping ourselves from living! Isn’t it the reason why we are protecting ourselves? So that we are kept alive? Yet when we value life so much, why are we not living life? Life in protection have lost its essence in why we choose to live life. We live to learn, to grow. In protection, in certainty, there is no learning, no growing because everything is known.Learn to live life, learn to adapt yourself, learn how to live with, in the unknown to be able to learn, to grow, that’s living life.

    About the Author:

    Stephen is an internationally certified Trainer of Master NLP, Trainer of Master Time Line Therapy, Trainer of Master Hypnotherapy accredited with ABNLP, TLTA, ABH. Stephen is the Regional Director for Seraphim Blueprint for training of teachers and students for all 6 levels. Stephen is also the creator of Oracodes Evolution Codes Program. More details http://www.oracodes.com.

  • The Gaian Paradigm Part 3 – Cooperative Life-Long Self-Learning

    Posted on October 14th, 2009 jane No comments

    Author: Bill Ellis
    Source: articleage.com

    A COMMUNITY LIFE-LONG LEARNING SYSTEM
    The potential for a new global governance rooted in civil society 9Paart 2) is
    only one example of the emergence of spontaneous self-ordered complex
    networks. Another interesting example of self organization on the edge of chaos
    is the emergence of Cooperative Community Life-Long Leaning Centers (CCL-
    LLCs).
    Early American schools were strict disciplinary centers in which students sat
    stiffly at their desks in abject obedience while stern teachers taught them the three
    Rs by rote memory. It’s purpose, at least during this century, has been to prepare
    workers for an industrial culture. It worked well. Laborers in American mills and
    factories surpassed all others in bringing wealth to our nation.
    An increasing number of educational critics, like 1991 New York teacher of the
    year, John Taylor Gatto in Dumbing us Down, have decried the schooling system.
    They contend that it is the form of schooling that is teaching the wrong lessons.
    The monopoly state schools restrict the individual’s natural curiosity and desire to
    learn. They teach authoritarianism, self-repression, and strict obedience to the
    clock. The teacher, under controls set by the state and now the national
    government, determines what is to be learned. The clock and the calendar
    determine when and how long a child can learn it. Much of this criticism of
    schooling has been reflected in a report to the president, A Nation at Risk.
    Well before the current attacks on schooling and educating, John Dewey and
    other philosophers assailed this concept of education with their creeds of “learning
    by doing” and “child centered education.” Although the philosophy of education
    changed the form didn’t. Twenty or more children are still gathered in one school
    room, each one trying to do his or her own thing. The result is that neither teaching
    nor learning is possible. Many schoolrooms become centers of confusion.
    Education is now at the edge of of chaos, ripe for a radical transformation.
    The organization of the new learning system is somewhat difference than the
    self-organization of local GROs into a Global Civil Society. For the example we
    examined above, organization came from moving from chaos, a disordered
    conglomeration of disjoint new organiztional cells, through the borderland of the
    edge of chaos into order. GlobaL Civil Society, like democracy before it, is self-
    organizing itself where nothing, or little, existed before. For the learning system
    reorganization is happening, in part at least, from the failure and disintegration of a
    too rigidly ordered system.
    One element of the reorganization of learning started two decades ago when
    some families started taking corrective actions one family at a time. It was called
    homeschooling. These actions grew in concert with Paul Goodman’s urging that
    schools make more use of community facilities and issues, with Ivan Illich’s seminal
    book Deschooling Society, and with John Holt’s Instead of Education (1976), and
    Growing Without Schooling (1977) on how children learn.
    In the beginning, only a couple of decades ago, homeschools were
    autonomous family units, each one setting it own curriculum, and providing its own
    supplies and services. As homeschooling grew in the 1970s and 1980s
    practitioners began forming associations primarily to exchange information and to
    confront state laws that limited their rights. There are now some 700
    homeschooling associations in the United States. About 50 of these have a nation-
    wide constituency.
    Most of the services provided to homeschoolers, like Growing Without
    Schooling, or Home Education Press, are primarily publications emphasizing
    exchanges among homeschoolers. Others like the Clonlara School Home-Based
    Education Center provide a by-mail service with curricula, tests, and diplomas for
    homeschoolers. Still others are newsletters written and exchanged by
    homeschoolers themselves. A few like Home Schoolers Defense Organization help
    homeschoolers with legal and legislative matters. One or two have books,
    equipment and other material for loans to homeschoolers. Some like ????? and
    Aerogram are publications condemning the authoritarian, monopolistic state school
    systems and supporting alternative educational systems.
    Closely associated with the home schooling movement are a broad variety of
    alternative schools which are moving in the direction of child-centered education.
    Jerry Mintz in his Handbook of Alternative Education lists 2500 Montessori schools,
    100 Waldorf schools, and 60 Quaker schools as well as the 700 homeschools
    programs. 9
    In additions to these is a growing number of Folk schools patterned after the
    Folk Schools of Denmark, “schools-without walls,” “Open Universities” and learning
    centers which do not fall within the province of being substitutes for the K-12
    governmental schools. It is this later group of learning facilities with which this
    paper is interested.
    In the last two or three years local homeschooling networks have started
    providing themselves with a new form of learning social institution. They don’t yet
    even have a universal name. To start examining them I will cvall call them
    “Cooperative Community Life-Long Learning Centers (CCL-LLCs).” These
    community centers are cooperatively owned and controlled by the member families
    they serve. They provide counseling, mentoring, supplies, facilities, workshops and
    classes. They serve everyone in the community regardless of age or past learning.
    They use all aspects of the community as learning facilities. Libraries, YMCAs,
    churches, museums, local businesses, farms, government offices, the streets, and
    the parks are all part of the learning system.
    As Gene Lehman put it in one of his Luno broadsheets “life long learning relies
    heavily on daily life activities, deep and variend interactions among people, contact
    with nature , and a popular culture which is abundant, diverse, profound, and
    cheaply accessible to all. Most importantly, a holistic approach to lifelong learning
    relies on developing some kind of face-to-face community of friends and
    neighhbors who co-operate in order to share the essendital burdens and delights of
    life.”10
    In 1998 Community Learning Centers became of governmental interest when
    the Elementary and Secondary Education Act dedicated $40 million to expand after-
    school programs. But this program was limited to school districts, and
    administered by U.S. Department of Education. It’s goal was primarily to get the
    kids off the streets, rather than to stimulate life-long or community learning. It was
    thus directed more at saving a decaying schooling system than experimenting with
    new futuristic systems of learning.
    Cooperative Community Life-Long Learning Centers may be one of the most
    seminal innovations of the past decade. They may be the seed for a deep
    fundamental change in the education/learning system of the future. Community
    Life-Long Learning Centers are to a large extent an outgrowth of the rapidly
    growing homeschooling movement. It is conceivable that CLL-LLCs could
    completely replace the state controlled schools.
    Civil Society and Learning
    The transition to a Community Life-Long Learning System is much more than a
    change in educational practices. It is a transformation of the whole mind set of the
    value of knowledge and the value of the person. “Teaching,” “educating,” and
    “schooling” imply that society, or government, is acting on, controlling,
    indoctrinating and forming some amorphous lesser beings. It is an hierarchical
    system of control from the top down. It is inherent in the first phase of democracy
    which accepted many of the tenets of rule from above, the divine right of kings and
    its transition to the divine right of government. It is in harmony with the fading
    worldview that the cosmos, and the Earth, are parts of the chain of being in which
    man is a semi god controlling the Earth from above, and all lesser forms including
    women, children, animals, plants and the Earth’s natural resources are but
    resources for the use of man.
    Every single word in”Cooperative,” “Community,” “Life-Long,” “Learning,” and
    “System” carries a different important connotation. “Learning” is not something a
    superior being does to a lesser one. Learning is an act of self-volition. It is a self-
    actuated process of creating skills, discovering knowledge, and satisfying one’s
    own natural curiosity. It is built on, and it teaches, the inherent right and
    responsibility of every individual to set her is his own standards. It honors the
    diversity of evolution. It is in harmony with the new Gaian worldview that
    everything is interdependent with everything else. It respects the new
    understanding that each of us “belongs” equally to Gaia.
    “Belonging” in this sense is much more that merely “being a member of.”
    Belonging is the scientific fact that we are all interdependent systems within
    systems, or holons wthin holons if you wish to use the systems jargon. Each of us is
    a whole made up of smaller wholes and imbedded in larger wholes. Gaia and the
    Cosmos are among the larger wholes of which each individual is a smaller whole.
    “Belonging” implies not only being a whole within wholes, but that we are subject to
    downward causation, we are subject to natural laws. “Belonging” to Gaia means
    belonging to the Earth and to one another. Belonging is an ethical proto-value
    inherent in the New Science/Social paradigm. It says that each individual is an
    integral part and responsible for the health and well being of the family, the
    community, Gaia, and each of the larger systems of high he or she is a part.
    Inherent in this scientific concept of belonging is much of the perennial wisdom of
    the sages which have recognized that humanity cannot continue to exist on Earth
    without laws of conduct which emphasise our responsibility to and for one another.
    This transition from “educating” to “learning” is being recognized by a wide
    variety of scholars. Management guru Peter Drucker in his “Post Capitalist Society”
    writes of a society based on knowledge. One in which all society is an open life-
    long learning system in which every person can enter any level at any time. From
    the other end of the spectrum peace scholar Elise Boulding reports that a common
    feature of the many “Imagine a World Without Weapons” workshops she has held
    with people of all walks of life and all ages, was the vision of a “localist society,”
    One in which communities were self-reliant and “Learning appears integrated into
    other community activities. … everyone is a learner, and education is life long.” This
    theme of the “Learning Community” is fully integrated with the growth of civil
    society and all other aspects of the emerging Gaian Cultures.11
    (1677 word on learning)
    Bill Ellis, of Rangely, ME retired early from his working life
    as a science policy consultant in agencies such as the National
    Science Foundation, Unesco and The World Bank. For the last
    30 years he has work voluntarily to promote the broad range of
    social innovations that empower people at the grass roots and
    promote community self-reliance. One of these is as General
    Coordinator, of ‘A Coalition for Self-Learning. With which he
    facilitated the drafting an online book, “Creating Learning
    Communities,” and, the White Paper, “Life-Long Self-Learning,”
    that promotes the recognition of the vast array of learning
    modalities in addition to public schooling — e.g. learning
    co-ops, public schools, private schools, unschooling, charter
    schools. His mantra is “everyone should have the right, the
    freedom, the resources and the opportunity to learn what
    they want, when they want and how they want.